Oliver Stone's 'JFK' and the Most Important 17-Minutes in Film

The Pivotal Park Bench Encounter: Donald Sutherland’s Mr. X and Kevin Costner’s Jim Garrison in JFK
In Oliver Stone’s sprawling 1991 political thriller JFK, few moments carry the weight and intensity of the meeting between Donald Sutherland’s enigmatic “Mr. X” and Kevin Costner’s determined New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison. Clocking in at just over 17 minutes, this single scene—set on a Washington, D.C., park bench—stands as a cinematic tour de force, a turning point that transforms the film from a procedural investigation into a chilling exploration of power, secrecy, and betrayal. It’s a moment where Sutherland’s commanding presence and Costner’s quiet resolve collide, leaving an indelible mark on audiences and cementing JFK’s place as one of the most provocative films of its era.
The Setup: A Collision of Truth and Conspiracy
By the time Garrison meets Mr. X, the audience has followed his dogged pursuit of answers in the wake of President John F. Kennedy’s 1963 assassination. Portrayed by Costner with an earnest, almost folksy sincerity, Garrison is a man out of his depth, a local DA challenging forces far larger than he initially comprehends. His investigation has unearthed troubling inconsistencies in the official Warren Commission report—namely, the “magic bullet” theory and the suspicious ties between Lee Harvey Oswald and shadowy New Orleans figures like Clay Shaw (Tommy Lee Jones). Yet, Garrison’s quest has been met with resistance, intimidation, and dead ends, leaving him grasping for a breakthrough.

Enter Donald Sutherland as Mr. X, a mysterious former black ops operative who emerges from the shadows to deliver that breakthrough. Clad in a trench coat and fedora, Sutherland cuts a classic figure of intrigue, his weathered face and measured delivery exuding authority and gravitas. The scene begins with an air of secrecy: “I could give you a false name, but I won’t. Just call me X,” he tells Garrison, setting the tone for a revelation that will upend everything the DA believes about the case—and the country he serves.
The Monologue That Shook a Nation
What follows is one of the most memorable monologues in modern cinema. Sutherland, reportedly spending four months preparing for this brief but pivotal role, unleashes a torrent of information with a calm intensity that belies the explosive nature of his words. He paints a picture of a vast conspiracy, implicating the CIA, the military-industrial complex, and even elements within the U.S. government in Kennedy’s death. “The organizing principle of any society, Mr. Garrison, is for war,” he declares, suggesting that JFK’s push for peace—his refusal to escalate the Vietnam War, his détente with the Soviets—made him a target of those who thrived on conflict.

Intercut with Sutherland’s narration are flashes of historical footage and dramatized recreations: Kennedy’s motorcade in Dallas, the Zapruder film’s infamous headshot, and glimpses of shadowy figures plotting in back rooms. John Williams’ pulsing score heightens the tension, while Stone’s frenetic editing mirrors the overwhelming scope of the conspiracy Mr. X describes. For Garrison—and the audience—it’s a moment of shattering clarity, as the assassination transforms from a lone gunman’s act into a coup d’état orchestrated to install Lyndon B. Johnson in the Oval Office.

Sutherland’s delivery is masterful, balancing precision with urgency. He barely pauses for breath, yet every word lands with purpose, drawing Costner’s Garrison (and viewers) deeper into the rabbit hole. Costner, for his part, plays the foil perfectly—his wide-eyed silence and subtle shifts in expression conveying a man grappling with the enormity of what he’s hearing. It’s a testament to both actors’ skill that the scene, despite its length and density, never feels like an exposition dump; instead, it’s a gripping exchange that propels the film into its climactic final act.
A Composite of Truth and Fiction
While the scene is a cinematic triumph, its historical grounding is more tenuous. Mr. X is a fictional character, a composite inspired by real-life figures like L. Fletcher Prouty, a retired Air Force colonel and vocal CIA critic who served as a technical advisor to Stone, and Richard Case Nagell, a U.S. Army veteran who claimed insider knowledge of the assassination plot. Prouty, in particular, lent credibility to the film’s narrative—he had been stationed in Antarctica during the assassination, a detail Mr. X echoes as evidence of being sidelined by conspirators. Yet, there’s no record of Garrison meeting such an informant, and the sweeping conspiracy Mr. X outlines owes as much to Stone’s imagination as it does to any documented evidence.

This blend of fact and fiction has long fueled debate over JFK’s legacy. Critics, including historians and journalists, have accused Stone of distorting history to fit his “counter-myth” to the Warren Commission’s “official myth.” The scene’s assertion that Kennedy planned a full withdrawal from Vietnam, for instance, contradicts evidence that he intended only a phased reduction of advisors, contingent on South Vietnamese success. Nevertheless, Stone has always maintained that JFK is less a historical document and more an emotional journey—a reflection of the distrust and disillusionment that gripped America in the decades after Dallas.
The Lasting Impact

For all its controversy, the Mr. X scene remains a cornerstone of JFK’s enduring power. It’s the moment where Garrison’s personal crusade becomes a national reckoning, and where Sutherland’s brief but electrifying performance elevates an already star-studded cast (including Gary Oldman, Joe Pesci, and Sissy Spacek) to new heights. Kevin Costner, riding high off Dances with Wolves, anchors the film with a relatable everyman quality, but it’s Sutherland who steals the show, turning a single encounter into a gravitational force that reshapes the narrative.

 

The scene also had real-world reverberations. JFK’s release in December 1991 sparked renewed public interest in the Kennedy assassination, leading to the 1992 Assassinations Disclosure Act, which mandated the release of previously classified documents. While those files—later declassified in waves, including under the Trump administration in 2017—haven’t confirmed Stone’s grand conspiracy, they’ve kept the questions alive, much as Mr. X’s words linger in Garrison’s mind.
A Cinematic Milestone
More than three decades later, the park bench meeting between Sutherland and Costner stands as a testament to JFK’s audacity and artistry. It’s a scene that dares to ask “Why?” and “Who benefits?”—questions that resonate beyond the specifics of 1963 to challenge the very nature of power and accountability. Whether you view it as a brilliant piece of fiction or a provocative distortion of history, there’s no denying its impact. As Mr. X fades back into the shadows, leaving Garrison to carry the torch, the audience is left with a haunting truth: some mysteries may never be solved, but they’ll never stop being explored.